The VonFrederick Group

by Leave a Comment

A Few Thoughts on the Democrat Victory That Gives Jihaist Hope

Now that the dust has settled and liberal democrats won control of both houses of Congress there are a few points that are worthy of note. First, votes win elections, not polls. The polls had liberals winning a slim majority in the House and Republicans retaining control of the Senate. I would rather accept the findings of the polls.

Election results are not being contested and litigated, except by a liberal democrat in Florida. If Republicans would have won you can bet the election results would still be tied up in courts across the land. The liberal motto is just win, if not by popular vote then by fraud or judicial fiat. [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

The Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group; A Path to Surrender and Defeat

“There is no substitute for victory” General Douglas MacArthur

“Neville” James Baker and Lee Hamilton “Chamberlain” submitted their Iraq “Surrender” Group report this week and it’s the talk of the town. The Sunday talk shows were replete with experts agreeing with and critical of the recommendations of the report, but not eventual withdraw.

Islamic Jihadist are pleased as the report gives them exactly what they wanted, a roadmap for U.S. defeat in the Middle East. The report does not mention victory, it’s a list to explain and justify defeat. Liberal democrats are giddy with the report as it is confirmation of their “Defeat with Honor” agenda. While Baker disagrees and says it does not advocate surrender or troop withdraw, actually it does. Baker-Hamilton use “diplo-mese” like setting bench marks for Iraqi achievement before surrendering so American politicians can blame the defeat on Iraqis. [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

Liberals and Jihadist Rejoice with Democratic Victory

Now that the dust has settled and liberal democrats won control of both houses of Congress there are a few points that are worthy of note. As previously noted votes win elections, not polls. The polls had liberals winning a slim majority in the House and Republicans retaining control of the Senate. I would rather accept the findings of the polls.

Another point worth mentioning is that even with rampant liberal voter fraud in several urban areas and overwhelming liberal media distortions of truth, the public is not subjected to whining about the election being stolen or litigation in nearly every court in the land. Conservatives tend to be introspective and analytical about what they did wrong. Rampant liberal voter fraud and liberal media bias is common in every election. Yet, in previous years republicans convinced enough voters to overcome the fraud and media bias. [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

Predictions in Sports or Elections, Who Really Knows?

As election-day quickly approaches the political pollsters, pundits and so-called experts are in high gear pontificating on the certainty of their predictions. The truth be told, they are not prognosticators with a crystal ball, just pundits with an opinion.

The futility of predictions is consistently demonstrated in sports. Take the ALCS between the New York Yankees and Detroit Tigers. The experts pronounced the Yankees would win ALCS series and the World Series. They sang praises about the strength of the great Yankee line up and how the Tigers would not be able to compete with these super stars. Being a Yankee fan, the experts told me exactly what I wanted to hear. Unfortunately, the Tigers did not get the memo. [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

A Teenager’s Fifteen Minutes of Shame

Front page material? A fourteen year old girl got interviewed by the secret services because she posted death threats to the President on her “Stab Bush” political web page. Good! Nothing better than a good spanking to straighten up opinionated teenagers and show them that the law applies to them too, and that if one ignores the laws, one better shut up and keep a low profile. That being said, I find it amazing that a fourteen year old can be actively militant and have any strong political orientation. When you total her life experience  – the 3 years in diapers, two years crawling at the carpet level, three or four years of Barbie, a year of Barbie and whoever the new boy friend is, the braces, the hormones kicking, the hunt for the black heads, the election of the school treasurer and the so called “molecular science” classes- you wonder where she found out that she was a liberal and that she hated Bush! [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

Democrats Campaign on Sleaze, Not Issues

The liberal campaign season is in full gear. Void of constructive ideas liberals rely on criticism, political lynching and smear campaigns hyped by their liberal “lap dog” media. In previous campaigns it was forged documents, accusations of substance abuse, and “outing” the V.P.’s daughter as a lesbian, on and on.

This election year the sleazy liberal democrat smear campaign hyped by the media entails the Mark Foley scandal. Today (10/05/06) Drudge reported that, “according to two people close to former congressional page Jordan Edmund, the now famous lurid AOL Instant Message exchanges that led to the resignation of Mark Foley were part of an online prank that by mistake got into the hands of enemy political operatives.”

Instead of campaigning on “real issues” that face America the liberal democrats are employing gutter political tactics and focusing on destructive propaganda. They are utilizing a few of Herr Goebbels Propaganda Principles; #1 – Propagandist must have access to intelligence concerning events and public opinion; #4 – Propaganda must affect the enemy”s policy and action; and #13 – Propaganda must be carefully timed. [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

Do We Need a National ID Card?

Does it look like we are finally going to have a national ID card?

It is about time we come up with some real ID, let”s say, something like my Green card, half plastic and half digital, hard to counterfeit and easy to scan for detailed identification data. Sure, teenagers and Illegal immigrants are not going to be happy about it; no more underage drinking on a fake ID for our partying kids! No more of anything from driver licenses to voting for illegal aliens! Well, unless the ACLU and liberals have their way of course!

Gee! What a concept! Only legit citizens will be entitled to what they pay for, at least a spark of common sense from our elected officials in DC!

by Leave a Comment

Don’t Confuse Hatred With No Respect Part 2

In the 06/13/06 blog “Don’t Confuse Hatred With No Respect“ the idea offered was that liberals view the world through a prism of hatred and project that view on anyone that does not agree with their view. Significant examples were given to support this idea. In part II this concept is additionally explored.

First, let’s define some terms. Hatred is hard to define and the dictionary does not do it justice. Webster defines hatred as the passion of hate and hate is defined as an intensely hostile aversion, compounded of anger and fear and centered on a real or supposed cause of injury. In practice the word suggest an intensity that definition does not sufficiently reflect. Webster defines respect as the special esteem or consideration in which one holds another person or thing. So, no respect would be lacking these characteristics.

The most interesting definition was that of liberalism. It was quite extensive and for the sake of brevity a partial definition by Webster will be given. It is an early 19th Century philosophy that has taken varying forms at different times in different places. It is characterized by progressive attitudes, critical of institutions and places its faith in the goodness of man and rationality. It often expresses demands for freedom of expression and equal opportunity. Economic liberalism was a phenomenon of the commercial or industrial classes, favoring free trade and the fixing of wages and prices by competition and opposing state intervention. However, in Britain it was adapted to provide welfare services and social security in conjunction with limited state intervention. [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

Terror Naïveté?

In today’s news, I read that TSA employees will take over from contract employees to check IDs at airports and that they will all attend a training in “psychological profiling”. What the heck is that? Profiling right now should be based on race and religion only, until more newly converted white Caucasian join the terrorist cause for some twisted murderous reason. No more random selection for the extra search should be made by the computers that manage the ticketing!

 

Political correctness is literally killing us! We need more spies infiltrating the mosques, more devices monitoring radical imams, more control of our borders, more background investigations, more scrutiny, and more common sense! [Read more…]

by Leave a Comment

Treason Pure and Simple

Treason, it seems like this issue will not go away. The issue was addressed in articles posted in the Vonfrederick blog on Nov 13, 2005, “Treason or Politics?” and again on Apr. 8, 2006, “Who is Committed to Victory?” Now with the recent article published by the New York Times that exposed a secret and legal government program to track terrorist funding, this word has once again been attributed to the liberal contribution to the nation’s War on Terrorism.

Webster defines treason as the act or attempted act of working for the enemies of the state; betrayal of trust, disloyalty to a cause. Treason is defined in the U.S. Constitution,

Article III, section 3, 1.Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. It’s pretty simple and straight forward.

Now consider extensive examples of liberal politician conduct and public statements in the liberal media that betray the trust of the American people and U.S. military fighting the terrorist; repetitive statements disloyal to the U.S. cause and adhering to the enemy cause. It would be excusable if rare “slips of the tongue”, but they are not. It is consistent and continual behavior and comments that harm the security of Americans at home and abroad. [Read more…]