The liberal democrat response to Rush Limbaugh’s “phony soldier” comment is both scary and hysterical. It’s scary because once again liberals assaulted the 1st Amendment by attempting to silence a private citizen. Hysterical in that liberals are once again brought focus on their failures and treason.

Distractive and repressive tactics are not a new phenomenon for power mongers. History illustrates that leaders of the world’s most repressive movements aggravated, mislead, lied and distracted the mediocre, the dissatisfied and disenchanted in order to hide their failures and achieve their quests for power. [Read more…]

Is failing “progressive talk radio” a constitutional right? Liberals in D.C believe so. In the name of fairness, they want to implement an affirmative action-like program that would legally impose radio “Liberal talk” content on Americans. Conservative programs are blamed for their success and finger-pointed for raising the awareness of their active listeners. Conservative talk shows are run by private companies for profit. They are successful because people actively dial in to listen to them. They are successful because they sell lots of advertising. They are successful because they are entertaining.

Also, they are not force-fed on radio listeners who have the choice to turn them on or off. Have any of you listened to Air America once, while driving. Liberal radio is boring, a driving hazard that should be made illegal. We used to have it in Sacramento until KCTC Sacramento switched to ESPN Sports (Air America filed chapt 11 10/13/06). Get a clue! I cannot wait to see how Democrats are going to make the “Fairness doctrine” fit the First Amendment. But they already sold us on legal racial discrimination to end racial discrimination, didn’t they? Where is the ACLU in this case? LOL.