“Those who study jihad will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world” Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (1942)

The Feb. 8th Vonfrederick blog article explored the deceptive economic fabrications Obama and his liberal disciples are repeating adnauseam. It should be obvious that the Political Activist in Chief is “winging it”. His incompetence in economics and governance is not to be outdone by his arrogant naive in foreign matters and warped sense of history.

It did not take long for the Marxist messiah’s “Hate America First” upbringing to surface. He signaled a move toward weakness to our Islamic enemies by offering his first presidential interview to the “Muslim world” via a Saudi-owned TV station instead of to American media. While putting America second was bad enough, his arrogant rambling was delusional. He said he wanted “a return to the same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago.” What mutual respect? As Amir Taheri noted Obama refers to “an illusionary past in the Muslim world that was in fact plagued by turmoil” [Read more…]

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed, and hence clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” H.L. Mencken

It has taken only a few weeks for the Man-Boy messiah to expose both his ineptitude and Marxist agenda. In efforts provide cover for his incompetence brain-dead liberals deflect, misdirect and lie on such a massive scale that it would make Joseph Goebbels proud.

Take the economy. In a speech to his congressional democrat minions at their Kingmill retreat, the new messiah reiterated the liberal myth. He whined about inheriting this economy and President Bush left it to him with a big bow. Yet the Man-Boy ignores the fact that President Bush also inherited a recession and did not whine like a child. [Read more…]

During the riots of the late 1960’s and early 1970’s the blacks burned down and looted their communities. A decade later their communities were still rubble. Investors and banks did not want to lose money and would not reinvest in these areas as they were “bad risks”. This was termed “red lining”.

Jimmy Carter and his liberal congress passed the Community Reinvestment Act (1977). For the intellectually challenged liberals, this law forced banks and investors to make high risk loans and outlawed “red lining”.

In 1993 Bill Clinton and his liberal cronies expanded the CRA and forced financial institutions to make even more high risk loans. If they adhered to common sense credit standards and did not increase the risky loans to those unable to repay them, the Clinton administration would levy heavy fines or deny requested expansions or mergers. Banks still balked at losing money. The liberal answer was more involvement by the quasi-government agencies, Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. They purchased these bad loans from the banks so the liberal housing welfare program could continue at tax payer expense, even though economist warned this would result in a future economic crisis. [Read more…]

What will 2009 bring? While predicting the future is guess work, accurate predictions are merely educated guesses based on objective assessments of current events and a healthy knowledge of history.

Prior to the elections some economist predicted that if Obama was elected the stock market and economy would suffer major declines escalating the crisis. These dire predictions were not mere anti-Obama rhetoric but educated guesses based on an objective assessment of empirical and historical data and current events. So far, the predictions have been accurate. The day after Obama’s election the stock market crashed and has since lost more than 42% of previous value. The housing market, consumer index and GDP have continued to decline, businesses are downsizing and unemployment rates are increasing. Many are fearful of a depression. Why? Intellectually vacant liberals blame President Bush. Others understand economic realities, are aware of historical similarities and recognize the crisis is a confluence of many events.  [Read more…]

Louis Farakhan’s new messiah won the election. It was not the landslide liberal democrats are proclaiming. It was not the mandate for the “progressive” agenda that John Podesta announced on Fox News Sunday. It was a sound defeat of the moderate Republican candidate, not conservative values. Including the 1.5 to 2 million fraudulent votes that the messiah did not need, the Marxist messiah won by about the same margin President George Bush beat John Kerry in 2004. Not one liberal democrat identified that 52% – 48% victory a landslide or agreed the 4% margin was a mandate.

Already we are starting to hear some in the liberal press express some “buyer’s remorse”. On Wednesday night after the election Charlie Rose and Tom Brokaw were discussing the messiah and admitted they “did not know anything about him.” Newsweek’s Evan Thomas and Jon Mechan referred to the messiah as “a slightly creepy cult of personality.” While these concepts have been substantiated repeated in interviews with liberals, even by respondents in Eric’s blog (Mr. President, 11/4/08), what was really taking place was a hedging of bets. It was a silent admission that the media is extremely biased and endorsed him, failed to objectively vet him, have a foreboding of a pending failed presidency and trying to reestablish some credibility. [Read more…]

After Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama on Meet the Press (10/19/08) the liberal media heralded the importance of the endorsement. Andrea Mitchell of NBC, hyped it as “a very powerful political statement.” While liberals fawn over Obama, credible columnist like Stanley Kurtz, Thomas Sowell, Amanda Carpenter, Tony Blankley and many more have reported on Obama’s unsavory alliances, poor judgment, dishonesty and Marxist policies.

In “Dreams From My Father” Obama stated, “I chose my friends carefully.” Interestingly enough Jack Cashill has made a convincing case that William Ayers was the “ghost writer” of the book. But the question that begs to be answered is why isn’t the liberal media mentioning “all” the “friends” Obama has chosen carefully? Here are some they fail to mention. [Read more…]

“It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once.” Philosopher David Hume

While watching the Vice Presidential debates last Thursday night I realized just how dangerous an Obama-Biden ticket is to a free America. It was bad enough that Sen. Biden started by demonstrating the liberal propensity to lie with his rewriting history in order to legitimize President Clinton’s intervention in the Balkan Civil War by falsely claiming genocide. And never mind the more than a dozen substantiated lies about global warming, the economy, tax increases, and his, Obama’s and McCain’s positions and voting record. It was his admission of the liberal view of the judiciary that should scare the hell out of any freedom loving American. Sen. Biden, like all liberal politicians, “hope” it won”t by relying on those who are incapable of critical thinking, uniformed, misinformed or just plain ignorant. [Read more…]

“You Can Put Lipstick on a Socialist, But He’s Still a Socialist” Doug Giles

In the words of the new messiah the republicans offer “just words, just speeches”. He should know. What has Obama done? What has he accomplished? Just an insignificant education and law practice, mediocre governmental experience and choosing is associates very poorly.

The result is a panic his candidacy. Simple minded liberal are having a total meltdown and it’s hilarious. For example, during a segment on Hannity & Combs (09/08/08) Alan was interviewing Chuck Norris and whined when he claimed the economy under President Bush was bad and repeated the liberal myth that under Clinton a good economy, no debt and a surplus. Too bad the facts don”t support the fool. The public debt in 1993 was $4.4 trillion and when Clinton left office in 2001 it was $5.8 trillion. That is a 1.4 trillion dollar increase in debt liberals ignore. Liberals ignore that during the eight years of Clinton the economy averaged a mediocre 2.06% growth in GDP. The overheating of the stock market gave gullible liberals the illusion things were robust until the dot.com crash and a “real” recession from 1999-2001. But what does facts have to do with it? Also there was no surplus, just fuzzy liberal math and wishful thinking.

Combs then attacked Sarah Palin claiming that she is out of touch with a majority of American when who are pro-abortion. Wrong again. Even during the 1970’s the split between woman for pro-life and pro-abortion was as about 50%. There was no real majority supporting either side.

Then Combs regurgitated the democrat talking point that Republicans were trying to scare Americans by falsely saying terrorist were supporting B. Hussein Obama. Once again the facts prove poor Combs is just a simple-minded fool. On May 13, 2008, Al-Jazeera reported Palestinians in Gaza engaging in phone banking activities for Obama and calling American voters at random asking them to vote for Obama. Ahmed Yousef, political adviser of Hamas said Hamas supports Obama and hopes he wins the election. Another example is on Sep. 7, 2008 Newsmax.com reported that Menashe Amir, Radio Israel’s Persian language service, reported that Iranian President Ahmadinejad has expressed “great pleasure” at the prospect of a Barack Obama victory in November and an Iranian religious leader said if Obama will enter the White House, then Islam will conquer the heart of the American nation.

On the Sep. 13, 2008, Meet the Press, Tom Brokaw could not camouflage his liberal bias and support for the new messiah. He attempted to challenge the Marxist Sen. Schumer on democrats raising the lack of experience issue with Sarah Palin when it re-focuses the issue on Obama and resulted in a drop in the polls. Brokaw allowed Schumer to avoid answering the question and let him ramble about liberal myths and bumper sticker slogans. Schumer repeated the liberal talking point that the election will be about Bush’s “bad” economy and change, but did not define what made it a bad economy or define the change Obama will bring. All Schumer could do was trash President Bush’s policies, without defining what policies.

But, Brokaw was more aggressive with Rudy Giuliani. He alleged the McCain ad about Obama supporting sex education for kindergarteners was a false republican attack ad. Giuliani corrected Brokaw with the fact that Obama voted for Illinois General Assembly Senate bill 0099, An Act Concerning Education, that specifically included sex education in kindergarten. Brokaw then supported Obama’s plan to raise capital gains taxes saying Warren Buffet agrees with Obama. Giuliani corrected Brokaw again with instruction on simple economics. An increase in capital gains taxes equals less government revenue every time it is tried. Brokaw defended Obama as a community organizer and repeated the ridiculous analogy traversing the liberal circuit that Jesus was a community organizer and Pontius Pilot was a governor. Talk about Panic! Brokaw went on to raise the ethical issues claiming Palin is not cooperating with Alaska trooper-gate. Giuliani once again corrected Brokaw and explained the investigation is not objective or unbiased and is in fact a political witch-hunt by Obama supporters that have already announced the outcome. No wonder 69% of Americans think the media is liberally biased.

As the moronic liberal media continues to lie in order to defend B. Hussein Obama and distort his resume, the new messiah just makes speeches and offers “Change”. Not the first Marxist to use that ploy. “I will be for change and I”ll bring you change” Fidel Castro