Over Exposed, Egotistical and Clueless

Crime, Education, Politics, Terrorism, Violence

During the 2008 campaign the Obama worshippers proclaimed he was the “new messiah” and “sort of a God” above it all. They criticized the “VP” candidate Sarah Palin (an accomplished executive) as lacking experience to “lead” and touted the messiah’s experience as a law professor, a community organizer and ability to vote present as the experience needed for president; maybe a liberal president.

Obama knows being a president is above his pay grade. Instead of governing he is making self aggrandizing speeches almost daily trying to convince Americans he is not the “Bolshevik” he is. His over exposure is no different than the Stalin’s, Castro’s, Mao’s and Saddam’s of the world. Instead of murals and statute’s he uses TV and Internet. He has usurped the TV media, traveled to more venues and spent more money in perpetual campaign than Bush and the other narcissist Bill Clinton did in eight years. What has America gained from the Marxist messiah’s policies and over exposure? A decline on the international scene, a decline in national security and a failing economy!

Let’s just look at some results of his catastrophic economic policies. Team Obama and the democrat Congress has given us a $1.6 trillion dollar deficit and increased the debt ceiling to $14 trillion dollars. And despite the new messiah’s pronouncement that he “has broken the back of the recession” and “the U.S. is now in recovery”, credible economist disagree. Nouriel Roubini, who predicted the current financial crisis, forecasted the U.S. economy outlook remains very dismal and is in trouble. Arthur Laffer warned that despite sporadic signs of growth the economy is headed for a “train wreck” in 2011 because of Obama’s unprecedented debt and increased tax rates. John Cogan forecast a dismal economy due to the uncertainty about Obama’s economic and tax policies. The CBO reports GDP might reach 1.8%, unemployment will average 9.8%, deficits will be more than $1 trillion for years to come and the massive debt burden will imperil our country’s future and push public debt levels to 60% of GDP this year.

Obama’s federal budget deficit in 2010 is $1,565 trillion and represents 10.6% of GDP. If his policies continue after 2012 the projections for the debt-to-GDP ratio will rise to 73% in 2015 and 77% by 2020. However, Moody Investors Service reported this understates the overall US debt level and including federal, state and local debt this ratio would be well over 100% in 2020.

The significance of this debt is illustrated by the fears the European Union is experiencing due to the weakening economies and increasing debt in Portugal, Spain and Greece. Portugal is reporting an economic and political crisis because the country has a deficit of 9.3% of GDP for 2009. The point being the US ratio is higher. Couple that with Moody’s warning that unless measures are taken to reduce the U.S. budget deficit or the economy rebounds significantly, the U.S. is at serious risk of losing its AAA government bond rating.

Economist say the deficit could be brought under control if the remaining $500 billion of Obama’s $800 billion stimulus package is not spent and the $500 billion in TARP funds the banks have repaid are refunded to the U.S. Treasury. But what does the Over Exposed-Egotistical-Wanna Be Dictator-in-Chief do? He continues to spend the stimulus funds and proposes a second stimulus package; takes the money the banks are repaying and spends it; and proposes increases in payroll, corporate, estate and income taxes. Arthur Laffer predicts this economic train wreck will end with Obama’s defeat in 2012. Let’s hope so!!!

George A. Torres, JrGeorge Torres

43 Comments

  1. George  •  Feb 9, 2010 @4:12 pm

    The new messiah was on the tube again this morning… that’s all we get from him is speeches…

    Hey Eric… I wonder if the jerry the Dunces of the world are happy with all this hope and change - these daily speeches and empty rhetoric

  2. Grant Xiong  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:00 am

    Yes, George, President Obama’s five back-to-back television interviews on Sunday were followed by an appearance Monday night on CBS’ late night show with David Letterman. The following morning, Mr. Obama was on television again, talking about climate change before a United Nations gathering and then addressing the United Nations’ General Assembly. No wonder the economy is as &%#@ up as you said.

  3. Gary Paul  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:03 am

    George, wrong again as always. Most Americans disagre with you too, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll. About 6 in 10, 58 percent, said Mr. Obama is making about the right number of public appearances and speeches these days. Do the math; does tthat look like we agree with you?

    Gary Paul

  4. Paul Trestrail  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:11 am

    Sir, your assertion about the president being overexposed implies that the president can interact with the people too much. Only Republicans who were satisfied with GWB holed up in the White House for months on end could think of such nonsense.

    I heard Obama on his health care speech which was masterful and the other night on Letterman which was interesting yet serious. Obama’s common sense approach to life makes him reassuring. One could be willing to go along with him on complex issues even though you do not completely agree with him because he seems to be genuine and smart in a down to earth way.

    I think that he gives the impression that he is on top of things and just because he is most interested in health care does not mean that he is not on top of many things.

    Paul Trestrail
    Kansas

  5. Johnny Mc.  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:13 am

    With the Republicans willing to damage America in order to take control of the federal government and both the Republicans and the Democrats taking hugh contributions from the medical industry (our leaders are like the executives of Enron) President Obama has to counter all of the tactics paid for.

    The total info structure of the United States (including the health care system) is so bad it will bring down our country and we have all the corporate tax policies and the individuals not willing to pay taxes no matter what we are faced with. I do wonder what it would have been like if these leaders were the ones we had in World War II.

    Johnny Mc.

  6. Ron  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:16 am

    Isn’t it sad that they have to question whether Obama is making too many appearances. He is the president and there are many problems this country has because the previous administration swept them under the rug while they we entranced by the problem in Iraq.

    The president is out and about because he has a lot of work and much to tell the American people. His opposition is not constrained by reality so Obama has to let the people know what is really at issue.

    Ron

  7. Nikki  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:18 am

    Let’ see, George W. Bush was mostly hidden from view and people complained. president Obama is in the forefront and people complain. I have an idea, stop taking FOXNews stupid polls and start writing sensible blogs for us to read. The White House isn’t broken, the Supreme Court isn’t broken, but Congress certainly is. There are 535 people who seem to have their own personal interests over that of the country.

    Nikki
    West Palm Beach

  8. Ken Chambers  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:20 am

    Of course not, George. He’s not over exposed, he’s actually doing what I hired him to do. He’s keeping me informed, and actually he would make a good mentor for Congress. This guy works constantly.
    Say what you want but he’s actually got a lot of things done or well on their way to being done. Over exposed? Not at all. I think your confusing Overexposure with a Good Work Ethic.
    It’s a refreshing change from a President who went on vacation every time I looked up. Can you understand that?

    Ken Chambers

  9. Happy American  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:23 am

    No. Obama is not overexposed. The public is overpolled. Stop the polls. Stop the madness. Don’t drink the KoolAid, George.

    Happy American

  10. Edward Hill  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:26 am

    I tend towards conservatism, though I am an espoused independent. Some of you would probably classify me as a “lower cased l” libertarian. Personally, I am not real happy right now, politically speaking.

    I think that after all the hope and promise speeches and all the “change we can believe in” rhetoric, it is clear to anyone in the middle of the road that this administration may be spinning faster than the last one, but is no better in terms of policy.

    Is the President overexposed? Is he out there making too many speeches? I don’t think so. Look! His job is to make speeches and to convince people to implement his policies, as he talks to them from his bully pulpit.

    The American patriot in me wants him to succeed. Why would I disapprove of that? If all these speeches give us a better nation and better world, then more power to him!

    The skeptic in me is taking a wait and see attitude, and is not impressed, thus far. Napoleon once said, “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” The President is clearly not (and never will be) an enemy of mine, but I won’t be running to his defense, any time soon, especially so long as he keeps delivering the same old message and the same old “inside the beltway” politics as usual.

    Edward Hill

  11. Harold Holcombe  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:30 am

    The Bully Pulpit is best used by those with oratorical gifts. President Obama is no slouch when it comes to delivery, teleprompter notwithstanding. Promise of real change, painted with bold strokes can inspire. Witness Kennedy explaining that we would go to the moon, Reagan saying tear down this wall, or Lincoln at Gettysburg. It would seem obvious that these speeches came from a passionate belief, and were not focus group tested. The carefully measured soundbites given by the President do not meet the threshold of passion, or conviction, or commitment.

    It is not a question of overexposure, it becomes a question of Leadership. Vague platitudes about health care reform will not break the stranglehold of the insurance corporations. The threat of a veto if no public option is included would make the electorate listen. It is true that the entire Democratic Party has given away most of whatever negotiating advantage it had when it started. The K street, business as usual, plus ca change crowd loves Baucus and his drive to save insurance as we know it. If Baucus is successful insurance will make record profits in the coming years.

    As the morning shows rolled by, it became clear that Obama is good with this. Lukewarm support for moving insurance away from profit is as good as letting the companies write the bill. (which they are doing…)

    As K street gyrates, and Obama bloviates, watch what words actually land in the bill – not what any of them are saying about it. The President needs to confront those against the public option and force them to defend in public the gross abuses of insurance. That I could watch all day….

    Harold Holcombe
    Washington, DC

  12. John Fund  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:32 am

    I guess I know where all those Republicans are coming from. I didn’t watch any of Obama’s recent appearances, except for a little bit on YouTube to see how George Stephanopoulos confronted him on how the individual mandate in health care was really a tax. From my perspective, Obama is always saying the same old, empty thing… It’s boring to even think of watching him on TV.

    John Fund

  13. Joanna Fairfield  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:34 am

    George, I am delighted the president is out there informing the American people what he is doing on their behalf. And with so many issues that need addressing, the people deserve a real leader who will keep them rightfully informed. After all, the people hired him for the position of President last November. I am thankful he recognizes this and acknowledges that the people deserve the right to know how he is handling the job he was hired to do. This is obviously a change some people are having trouble with.

    Joanna Fairfield

  14. Patrick Willis  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:36 am

    Of course he’s not overexposed, jealous Ass. President Obama’s intellect and energy are far superior to anyone who has ever held the office. He can handle it….as all the world can see! There!!!!

    Patrick MIlls

  15. Jenny  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:37 am

    It’s not that he’s overexposed, George. It’s just that the state of political discourse in this country is in such shambles that we’re spending time talking about this or about Joe Wilson or about racism than the issues at hand.

    Jenny

  16. Joe M  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:40 am

    As a Democrat who doesn’t agree with all of President Obama’s Policies, I will give him the benefit of the doubt like cheney’s puppet (lies about Iraq) and President Clinton’s Lewinsky scandal did him in.

    Overexposed? NO! It refreshing and assuring to have a leader who is intelligent and articulate.

    Here’s a question for you George, and in particular, Republicans: Would you rather have cheney’s puppet as president or President Obama?

    Joe M

  17. Hank Witherspoon  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:43 am

    No. It’s just the contrast with Bush. Bush spoke about terrorism to military members and families, almost always on military bases. Other than a stray speech on education or declaring we should man a mission to Mars; I can’t remember even one time where he 1) spoke in public or 2) didn’t go on and on about terror and 9/11 etc.; while ignoring every other problem besetting our world and nation. And let’s underline one of the problems he ignored – out of control spending and the national debt. No George!!! This financial crisis stuff you wrote about didn’t start with Obama.

    Hank Witherspoon

  18. Elvis Arthurton  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:44 am

    If 58% of those polled think the Pres is making the right number of appearances/speeches, then probably the same number approve of the job he is doing. And that’s pretty good. With so many diverse media outlets, it’s hard to be overexposed. It’s not as if the entire nation is watching or listening to all the venues. Each has an audience, and there might not be much overlap. Also, the most vocal opposition comes primarily from shrill conservative pundits/talking heads who are preaching to the converted. His measured style is far more appealing to those who might not agree with him, but are willing to listen.

    Elvis Arthurton

  19. Jerry Saxz  •  Feb 13, 2010 @2:49 am

    George the follower, wrote “Nouriel Roubini, who predicted the current financial crisis, forecasted the U.S. economy outlook remains very dismal and is in trouble. Arthur Laffer warned that despite sporadic signs of growth the economy is headed for a “train wreck” in 2011 because of Obama’s unprecedented debt and increased tax rates. John Cogan forecast a dismal economy due to the uncertainty about Obama’s economic and tax policies. ”

    More reasons why you need to have a mind of your own, Georgy. You are always being led by these people from the right. see why you have no credibility? Give us ONE good reason why we should pay attention to those jokers.

    Jerry Saxz
    Ohio

  20. George  •  Feb 14, 2010 @7:18 pm

    Gary Paul, Paul, Johnny, Ron, Nikki, Ken, Joanna, Patrick, Joe, Hank and Elvis
    Funny but the results of credible polls like Zogby and Rassmeusen show that a majority of people – an most important likely voters – find that a large majority of people disapprove of Obama’s policies and think the country is moving in the wrong direction – and the people expressed their disapproval of Obama in MA, NJ and VA – I noticed you liberals seem to ignore that inconvenient truth.

    A question raised in the article was – is Obama excessive appearances similar to the Stalin’s, Mao’s and Castro’s of the world? From your responses I would gather that you think their excessive exposures is OK too.

    Can you Obama worshippers tell me exactly what the Bozo-in-Chief has accomplished? Did you “hire” Obama to travel around America and the world to vacation, play golf and read from a teleprompter, or did you “hire” him to govern?

    And Paul… what “common sense approach”? Saddling America with $1.7 trillion deficit?

    And Johnny… while I was critical of Republican spending on things like prescription drugs and no child left behind – you seem to ignore that in 2006 the deficit was $169 billion and projected to be balanced by 2009 – but the democrats took control of congress and instead we had a $469 billion deficit when Pres. Bush left office – because he would not veto or at least fight the democrat spending…

    And Ron & Jenny… what are the “real issues” the teleprompter prez is letting us know about? What are these issues at hand he is resolving or at least addressing – and how?

  21. George  •  Feb 14, 2010 @7:23 pm

    Edward & Harold… looks like a majority of the people don’t agree with his use of the bully pulpit and are not convinced he should implement his destructive policies… see MA, NJ, VA – and the several states where democrat incumbents are losing because they drank Obama-aid

  22. George  •  Feb 14, 2010 @7:23 pm

    Joe… Cheney’s puppet? Who is that? What lies about Iraq? I don’t know who Cheney’s puppet is but YES – I would rather have anyone other than Obama – Ronald McDonald and Bozo the Clown would be better!!! The 4 stooges we are stuck with, Obama, Biden, Pelosi and Reid make the original 3 stooges look competent !!

  23. Dee Dee  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:36 pm

    I’m proud of my president working so hard – I don’t want a LAZY president like the last one.

    Dee Dee

  24. Bob  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:39 pm

    The writer asked, “Can you Obama worshippers tell me exactly what the Bozo-in-Chief has accomplished?”

    One thing; he restored the world-wide faith and confidence that Bush eroded, back to America. That is leadership, my friend. Wake up. Now tell us, what did Buas do beside going to war for no reason?

    Bob

  25. Becky Tony  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:41 pm

    I’m proud of my president working so hard – I don’t want a LAZY president like the last one!

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not going to demonize Bush but he was pretty lazy.

    Becky Tony

  26. Sean Willis  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:42 pm

    You latest responses are incorrect, George. Personally, I like that the President is involving the American people in the debate and process. It’s perfectly in line with his stated philosophy of making government more accountable and representative of it’s citizens. Quite a welcome departure from the steady erosion of our basic liberties and planning of wars from behind closed doors from the previous administration. And I say that despite being a registered independent who actually voted for Bush!

    Sean Willis
    Walhala, North Dakota

  27. Denny  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:43 pm

    Never seen a Presidnet so in love with the sound of his own voice as the current one. I used to think Bill Clinton was narcissistic, but not anymore.

    Denny

  28. Pardner  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:44 pm

    I am also fed up with this race garbage that people are hiding behind. He needs to answer questions. When a tough question is asked there are many idiots who say it is a race issue. You people are like sheep that are being led by a judas goat.

    Pardner
    Austin, TX

  29. Proud Republican  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:45 pm

    I am tired of all your BS. Those that think that the O’Bama is over exposed are by definition rethuglicons.
    They don’t and can’t accept that the job of POTUS is to inform those that elected him, not to be clearing brush in west Texas and being a jeezuz freak…
    Deal with it rethugs – the cold war is over, stop fighting it already. It’s time you get with the tasks of working in the new world order where Americans lead by example and diplomacy, not dictates and military intervention…

    Proud Republican

  30. Wayne Morris  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:52 pm

    Have those slime bags go to hell, George. The President is pretty weak-kneed on this. He only goes on shows that will placate to him and ask him soft questions and he does the smoke and mirror swarmy answers. To gain credibility he needs to meet with the press that are not afraid to ask the tough question and put him on the spot. He is very gutless.

    Wayne Morris

  31. Bo Leggs  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:53 pm

    You liberal dems are funny. You’re kidding with this, right? He’s in everyone’s face CONSTANTLY. The man’s the worst President, EVER.

    Bo Leggs

  32. Alabama Mom  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:55 pm

    Um, George, if his healthcare plan is so wonderful, and if the American people are ’so behind and supportive’, then why does he need to go on every Sunday morning talk show? On Letterman? This smacks of desperation.
    Like someone else said, the one channel he needed to go on he wouldn’t. Sounds like the Obama Administration is afraid of Fox News.

    ‘Bama Mom
    Alabama

  33. Sheela Wright  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:57 pm

    NBC Poll = taking a quick survey among staff in the NBC newsroom.

    Obama is attenion-starved child whose father left him and mother caroused with muslim men.

    We can do better!

    2010

    SW
    New York

  34. Sebastian  •  Feb 18, 2010 @7:59 pm

    For those that think he is over exposed, get off your couch, turn off the Internet and go out and work or volunteer your time. Perhaps you all do not work. Do something for another human. You Republicans are the most selfish-self centered people. The people voted in Obama because we wanted changed from the 8 years of hidden agendas, self-serving propaganda, in your face religious rhetoric, and costly warmongering. If your not part of the solution, then your part of the problem. I am glad Obama is working and explaining. There needs to be more like him in DC… versus the status quo.

    Sebastian
    San Francisco

  35. Doug Haven  •  Feb 18, 2010 @8:01 pm

    You are out of touch, George. In 2012, if 49% of the voters think Obama is the Antichrist, and 51% vote for him reluctantly because they think “Hey, at least he’s better than Palin,” Obama still wins.

    As Chuck Todd (NBC News) put it, 51% isn’t a great approval rating, but these days, it makes Obama the most popular politician in Washington. Where is Bush when you need him? )LOL)

    Doug Haven

  36. Intelligent  •  Feb 18, 2010 @8:02 pm

    No, we love seeing the JOKER on TV every day.

    What we’re waiting for is BATMAN.

    Intelligent

  37. Henry Glass  •  Feb 18, 2010 @8:04 pm

    To George and all the other idiots out there. A President cannot become overexposed.

    He should tell us what his plans are for this country and we should listen or read. Capiche?

    Henry Glass

  38. Francisco George  •  Feb 18, 2010 @8:06 pm

    Well, for those of you who think NBC is the new “mouthpiece” for the WH, then remember that Fox was the same for Bush Jrs WH, and still thinks it is. Just listen to all the news channels and even read both sides of the written media and then make a decision. There are probably some of you who still think that Ollie North was the problem in the Iran/Contra scandal…wrong…it was Reagan/Bush Sr. Did you know that, George?

    Francisco George
    Miami

  39. Scott Brennan  •  Feb 18, 2010 @8:07 pm

    Obama have given more speeches than the number of days he’s been in office. This guy is an extreme narcissistic, if Bowling for Dollars or Sci-Fi theater was still on the air he would make an appearance on the show.

    Scott Brennan
    Phoenix, AZ

  40. Nathaniel Francis  •  Feb 18, 2010 @8:11 pm

    Overexposed, George? The only people who think he’s overexposed are mostly those who think seeing him once is one too many, such as you. The only way he would overexposed is if his presence would be unnecessary. Obama needs to go out there because so many peopl are misinformed and uninformed, and so many right wing politicians exploit the fools, such as you. He needs to make his case and get the American people on board. In other words, lead by the facts and communication.

    Nate Francis
    Montana

  41. Megan White  •  Feb 18, 2010 @8:12 pm

    A moment without Obama is like a moment without sunshine.

    Meagan

  42. Josh  •  Feb 18, 2010 @8:14 pm

    I would guess if someone is a conservative, any exposure by Obama would be too much, but so what, they won’t vote for him anyhow.

    Josh

  43. George  •  Feb 19, 2010 @9:59 pm

    Liberals post here proved my point - repaired out image in the world is a laughable; world leaders are making jokes about the narcissistic messiah; but I will help you out. Here are a few accomplishments of team Obama; unemployment 17% plus; $1.8 trillion dollar deficit; $14 trillion dollar debt; record breaking housing foreclosures; record breaking vacancies in commercial property; the most cabinet nominee withdraws of any presidencies (including the bozo Carter & skirt chaser Clinton; Islamic terrorist acts on US soil…

    yet brain dead liberals continue their existence in the alternative universe of ObamaOz Land…

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>