Contact
Subscribe
May 5, 2009 
Will future historians chronicle the rise and fall of America? Will historians debate the demise of the great constitutional republic? If so, I suspect a common theme in such demise will be the erosion of the constitution. Historians will discover that Marxism, or namesakes Liberalism or Socialism, will have destroyed another productive and successful society. The Democrat Party, hijacked by liberals, will have achieved this destruction by bastardizing the Constitution to placate the whims of intellectually and morally bankrupt liberals. Once the Constitution was morphed into a meaningless living-breathing document, the deterioration of American traditions and family followed.
While there are several causes of societal dysfunction, the homosexual’s assault on marriage is definitely a significant one. Intellectually vacant liberals are too shallow to understand the deeper implications that homosexual marriages has on our society. Marriage and family is the fabric of societal survival and abolishing traditional marriage will result in societal decay.
In April the Vermont legislature legalized homosexual marriage. It joined the ranks with Massachusetts, Connecticut and Iowa where liberal activist judges legalized same sex marriage by judicial edict and over the objection of a majority of citizens. And the assault on tradition and family continues.
Polygamists in Canada are using the same arguments the homosexual activists used to legalize their abnormal unions. In 2004, the Canadian Supreme Court legalized same sex marriage by substituting the words “one man and one woman” with “two persons”. Already a polygamy case is moving toward the Supreme Court. In Jan. 2008, Winston Blackmore, a fundamentalist Mormon, was charged with polygamy. Blackmore’s lawyer says he will base his defense on the changes made to Canadian law to allow same sex marriage. Since the law permits homosexual marriage, his multiple marriages should also be allowed.
Liberals and homosexuals who object to polygamy ignore it has been sanctioned by some successful societies and historic religions for thousands of years. Homosexual marriages haven’t! Also, polygamists are a larger minority and not limited to Mormons and Muslims. Christian polygamist claim they are following practices of prophets in the Old Testament. Secular polygamists claim they “are just wired to be not jealous” and need more than one person in their marriages. As evidenced in Sisterwives, a pro-polygamy website.
With time, the legalization of pedophilia will most likely follow. The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is an organization that advocates abolishment of the age-of-consent, liberalization of laws against sexual relations between adult and minor males and “sexual freedom for all”. It is using the same methods to advance its agenda as homosexuals. It is the largest organization in the umbrella group International Pedophile and Child Emancipation (IPCE) and is not limited to males. Women’s Auxiliary of NAMBLA and the website “Butterfly Kisses” celebrate erotic relationships between women and young girls.
Remember, homosexuals began by decriminalizing sodomy. Pedophiles are trying to lower the age of consent which will decriminalize pedophilia. It can happen. Twenty years ago most did not believe same sex marriage could happen. The age of majority has been lowered so girls under the age of 18 can access abortions and the “morning after pill” without parental consent. Under California law (SB 777) school children as young as kindergarten receive sexual indoctrination on homosexuality, bisexuality, and trans-sexuality. Liberal judges and Obama’s justice department advocate the use of foreign law, even sharia law, when deciding some US cases. The Dutch Paedophile Emancipation Movement led to the Dutch enacting a liberal law permitting sex between an adult and a child as young as 12 if the child consents. Will liberal democrats use Dutch law to justify lowering the age of consent in the U.S. to 12 yrs?
These deviant groups must be encouraged by liberal activist claim same sex marriage is an “inalienable” right, protected against “discrimination” or have a mythical right to privacy. Advocates of polygamy and marriages between bisexuals, transsexuals, first level blood relatives, or whatever, can use the same arguments as homosexuals.
Homosexuals claim marriage is about “coupling”. If marriage is not an institution about children, family and the survival of society, what institution is? Re-defining marriage to accommodate same-sex couples would nullify traditions in culture and family. History has shown that when you erode the family unit illegitimacy, crime, poverty, moral decay and eventually the end of the society follows.
George Torres
